I think this is good for every large project.  I am glad you pitched it as a 
suggestion and not a "rule" though.  No use fighting over this.  Let's all try 
to do this.

Dennis Byrne

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:49 AM
>To: 'MyFaces Dev mailing list'
>Subject: Suggestion: Jira issues for all non-sandbox changes
>
>One of the things we do for the Cayenne project which has really
>helped the Cayenne team out is to create a Jira issue for all changes.
>  This makes creating release notes (as well as tracking behavior
>changes) easy -- there's always a record of it in issue tracking
>system.
>
>I'd like to suggest that MyFaces begins to do the same thing for Impl
>and Tomahawk.   I don't consider it to be as important for sandbox
>components.
>
>As things stand, someone might fix an unreported bug in snapshot, but
>someone else using a released version reports it later, and no one
>(other than the fixer) knows that it's already been taken care of.
>
>Worse is the case where someone changes behavior, creating a new
>problem "somewhere" in the code, but no one knows who or exactly where
>short of searching through every commit message, and the original
>person changing the code isn't monitoring the discussion on the issue.
>


Reply via email to