[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416?page=comments#action_12412043 
] 

Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-416:
--------------------------------------------

Looks like this also breaks MyFaces Core (without tomahawk) too:

http://www.nabble.com/ExtensionsFilter-now-mandatory--p4325444.html

On 5/10/06, Jonathan Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I've been trying out MyFaces 1.1.3 after previously using 1.1.1.
> 
> Everything went fine except that all my h:commandLinks stopped
> working, because they were generating onClick javascript which
> called clear_linkDummyForm, but the javascript method itself was
> not being generated.
> 
> After a bit of a search on the JIRA, I tried adding in the
> Tomahawk ExtensionsFilter (from Tomahawk 1.1.2), and lo,
> clear_linkDummyForm() is added to pages which have the
> ExtensionsFilter mapped and not to pages which don't.
> 
> Is it really the case that the ExtensionsFilter is now mandatory
> to make basic (non-extension) JSF features work, or am I missing
> some new bit of config?
> 
> I assume it must be the latter, because if ExtensionsFilter was
> mandatory, why not just roll its functionality into the core MyFaces
> servlet?


> Installing Tomahawk breaks jsf-ri commandLink and Button components
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: TOMAHAWK-416
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-416
>      Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Extended CommandLink/CommandButton, NavigationMenuItem
>     Versions: 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT
>     Reporter: Mike Youngstrom
>     Priority: Blocker

>
> It appears that the extended Link and Button renderers added to the tomahawk 
> faces-config break JSF-RI's ability to correctly render Links and buttons.  
> This is a serious issue.  Coming up soon will be the first solo tomahawk 
> release which is supposed to help show tomahawk's independence from myfaces 
> core.  Yet this release will be completely unusable on the only other major 
> jsf implementation out there.  Let me know if there is something the RI can 
> do to help fix this problem.
> Mike

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to