Again, its not clear why this was reverted.  You should probably
create a JIRA issue if the fix was causing a problem and reference
that in your checkin.

Sean

On 5/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: imario
Date: Tue May 30 06:33:14 2006
New Revision: 410276

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=410276&view=rev
Log:
revert r406721 - for loop is NOT unnecessary

Modified:
    
myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/custom/tree2/HtmlTreeRenderer.java

Modified: 
myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/custom/tree2/HtmlTreeRenderer.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/custom/tree2/HtmlTreeRenderer.java?rev=410276&r1=410275&r2=410276&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/custom/tree2/HtmlTreeRenderer.java
 (original)
+++ 
myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/custom/tree2/HtmlTreeRenderer.java
 Tue May 30 06:33:14 2006
@@ -217,9 +217,12 @@
             }

             // now encode each of the nodes in the level immediately below the 
root
-            if (walker.next())
+            for (int i=0; i < rootNode.getChildCount(); i++)
             {
-                encodeTree(context, out, tree, walker);
+                if (walker.next())
+                {
+                       encodeTree(context, out, tree, walker);
+                }
             }
         }

@@ -270,9 +273,14 @@
             }
         }

-        if (walker.next())
+        TreeNode node = tree.getNode();
+
+        for (int i=0; i < node.getChildCount(); i++)
         {
-            encodeTree(context, out, tree, walker);
+            if (walker.next())
+            {
+               encodeTree(context, out, tree, walker);
+            }
         }

         if (clientSideToggle)



Reply via email to