DWR puts copies the java files /WEB-INF/classes . That might work. Dennis Byrne
>-----Original Message----- >From: Catalin Kormos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2006 11:41 AM >To: 'MyFaces Development' >Subject: Re: Maven work > >I just want to ask for your opinion about including the sources into the >examples wars. My opinion would be to have them included in the corresponding >war under WEB-INF/sources and have separate downloadable war for each of the >examples (tiles, simple, wap...). > >Another option would be to have all the wars included into a larger archive, >like tomahawk-examples-1.1.3.tar.gz, and the corresponding sources packaged as >jars and included into tomahawk-examples-1.1.3-src.tar.gz. This is how it >worked before moving to maven. > >What do you think, which is more intuitive? > >Regards, >Catalin > >Catalin Kormos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sounds great, i'll go ahead an see >what else could be improved by using the new assembly plugin. > >Regards, >Catalin > >Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 but lets coordinate when you >check in the resulting pom's b/c we >will need to upgrade the maven instance on our contiuum server and we >will want to alert users and developers. > >Why don't you go ahead and see what you can do? If you can simplify >anything else about our assembly feel free. > >Sean > >On 5/31/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: >> Could the version 2.1 of the assembly plugin be used (requires maven 2.0.4) >> instead of the current 2.0-beta-1? the newer version is much more capable, >> one new nice feature would be that it permits specifying more than one >> assembly descriptor for the same project, making it easy to generate both >> sources and binary distributions. >> >> Regards, >> Catalin >> >> >> Sean Schofield wrote: >> >> [moving this to the dev list so all can contribute] >> >> None of these are part of the nightly build (which is really the same >> as the form release.) Right now we build with >> >> mvn -Pgenerate-assembly >> >> and then from the assembly directory >> >> mvn assembly:assembly >> >> Martin checked something in to address the source code issue but I >> cannot make it work. >> >> Sean >> >> On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: >> > Thanks. >> > >> > About the sandbox assembly, what you say make sense to me too, i didn't >> plan >> > to do that :) just gave that as an example. >> > >> > Are the sources, examples, or sandbox included now in the nightly builds? >> > >> > Regards, >> > Catalin >> > >> > >> > On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield wrote: >> > > Thanks for the patch. Its been applied to the branch. AFAIK there is >> > > no assembly for sandbox. The idea I think would be to not include >> > > sandbox in the official release but to include it in the nightly >> > > builds. You should post to the dev list about that though and see if >> > > there is conensus (some users want official releases but the sandbox >> > > stuff is very experimental right now.) >> > > >> > > Sean >> > > >> > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: >> > > > Hi Sean, >> > > > >> > > > Here is the patch to add the missing tag to the pages related >> >> > to >> > > > sorting from simple examples. I couldn't find anything wrong with >> > > > pagedSortTable.jsf , maybe in the meantime this got resolved. >> > > > >> > > > Martin ask me if i could help you out with the deployment problems, >> like >> > > > missing sandox.jar, sources, examples, etc. I could help with these, >> if >> > you >> > > > need, i'll just need a little more details about this. I'm not very >> > familiar >> > > > with these process, but as far as i can tell, for example, sandox >> > idoesn't >> > > > have an assembly process at all. >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > Catalin >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com
