tracking system), but there hasn't been a formal roadmap for JSF.next
so is JSF.next the project name for it?
that happens, it would be very much appropriate that Apache have a representative on the EG, and it would seem to make the most sense that this rep be someone from the MyFaces community.
Manfred is already there. I think Martin is interested too. -Matthias
In the interim before the formal announcement, talk to Ed Burns and Roger Kitain, who were the co-spec leads for 1.2 (and AFAIK that's not changing for future versions, but I'm not as intimately connected with the specs world in my Creator architect role -- instead, I'm a customer :-) about the kinds of areas you would like to see a 2.0 spec cover. > -Matthias Craig > [1] https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=176 > > On 6/6/06, Craig McClanahan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > CONVERTER_ID = "javax.faces.DoubleTime " > > > > > > Looks like a spec bug due to a cut-n-paste error in the RI's API classes. > > If so, the correct thing to do would be to report feedback via the website > > on the spec cover ( > > https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net) so that > > it can get addressed as an errata, or included in a maintenance version of > > the 1.2 spec. > > > > Until then, though, I'd recommend you keep it ... this is the kind of > > mechanical detail that the API signature tests in the TCK will likely flag > > if it's missing. > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any reason for keeping [1] ? > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > [1] http://tinyurl.com/gjdxe > > > > > > > > On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > Ah, > > > > > > > > > > thanks. Some are some issues also the reasons, why UIComponent is not > > > > > an interface? > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > On 6/5/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Backwards compatibility - at least of a sort; you won't get > > > > > > AbstractMethodErrors when using 1.1-compiled subclasses. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does anybody know why the methods added to ViewHandler or > > > > > > > ExternalContext in 1.2 are not abstract, like their *old* JSF 1.1 > > > > > > > counterparts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > Aechterhoek 18 > > > > 48282 Emsdetten > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > Aechterhoek 18 > > > 48282 Emsdetten > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > Aechterhoek 18 > 48282 Emsdetten > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
