The 1.1.3 SNAPSHOT is the release candidate :-) Technically its a "snapshot" because maven considers anything that hasn't been officially released as such.
Sean On 6/7/06, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please update the 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT so it the same as the RC. This will make it much easier to test the RC with maven project that are configure to use the Tomahawk snapshot. http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/tomahawk/tomahawk/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/ Paul Spencer Sean Schofield wrote: > OK there is an updated release candidate up there now. Can someone > check it to make sure Dennis' logging stuff made it in? I need to > leave the office for a bit. Once this is confirmed we can start the > vote thread. (In the meantime I will be preparing the artifacts for > an anticipated release.) > > Sean > > On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk. I merged it >> up to the branch for you. >> >> Sean >> >> On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven. You checked >> > it into the shared branch right? >> > >> > Sean >> > >> > On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > The logging stuff actually was in shared though. >> > > >> > > Dennis Byrne >> > > >> > > >-----Original Message----- >> > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM >> > > >To: 'MyFaces Development' >> > > >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release >> > > > >> > > >OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then? The current >> 1.1.3 >> > > >snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the >> > > >logging changes that Dennis made. I'll put together the official >> > > >release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.) >> > > > >> > > >Sean >> > > > >> > > >On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI >> > > >> But to me no showstopper. >> > > >> >> > > >> So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC >> > > >> >> > > >> -Matthias >> > > >> >> > > >> On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > The logging was actually in shared BTW. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Dennis Byrne >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >-----Original Message----- >> > > >> > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > >Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM >> > > >> > >To: 'MyFaces Development' >> > > >> > >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the >> release. >> > > >> > >Thanks for the help. You are a MyFaces animal these days. >> Glad to >> > > >> > >have you back on full time! >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >Sean >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Sean- >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me... >> > > >> > >> I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my >> last testing. >> > > >> > >> For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and >> the scroller worked >> > > >> > >> there for me. >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> I go ahead and close this issue. >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> -Matthias >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST). >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > -Matthias >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this >> release? >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > Sean >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > I verified that two of the issues are also present >> in the 1.1.2 >> > > >> > >> > > > release so I don't consider these showstoppers. >> Anyone disagree? >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > That leaves one last bug. TOMAHAWK-458. Can folks >> take a quick look >> > > >> > >> > > > at this one. >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > Sean >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > Jira issue created. >> > > >> > >> > > > > Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try! >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -Matthias >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > Matthias, >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version >> as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > That will allow us to keep track of the >> outstanding issues. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > Sean >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > RI makes some trouble with this build of >> Tomahawk. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some links are not working (sortable table >> for instance) >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some links I must trigger twice to get a >> *result* (scrolling through a table) >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of >> rendered output) >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -forceId,jsp makes troubles >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > duplicated IDs >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > commandLink id=button inside form >> id=forceIdForm >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > commandButton id=button inside form >> id=dataTable >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > both are forceId=true >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > for me it should be fine, since their jsf >> client id is >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > a)forceIdForm:button >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > b)dataTable:button >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > but not all components are making problems >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -fileupload or tree2 are working fine. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Matthias >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Just check the updated brunch. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Now the *rc* looks good to me! >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > -Matthias >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Patch has been applied. Can we do a >> little more basic testing on >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > this? I will try to finish up the release >> process and start a vote >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > thread tomorrow. We should have some >> basic testing first though in >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > order that we not have any embarassing >> mistakes like the one Matthias >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > found. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Sean >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, i'm glad to be here :) >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it >> to you, i don't have commit rights >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > yet. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Regards, >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Catalin >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Catalin, >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Welcome to the team. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Your dummy form explanation is probably >> correct. Someone added a >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > bunch of tags to many of the examples >> but probably not all. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? >> If you can't commit yet just >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > send me the patch. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Regards, >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sean >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > I tested also those pages with the >> latest from SVN, a first problem is >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > that >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > they are missing an enclosing . Maybe >> now this a problem, cause the >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > dummy form is no more added? not sure >> though. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Regards, >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Catalin >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: >> Thanks for >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > testing >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > @Everyone: Any ideas on these? >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sean >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 >> worked for me. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Installed the simple example war. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Some "pages" causing trouble: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -sortTable.jsf (not working; click >> on a link has no efect) >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -sortAutoTable.jsf (same) >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the >> scroller icons has no effect, >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > when you click first time. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > summary: for navigation to next page >> (after page has rendered first >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > time) it needs two clicks. after >> that each click goes to the next >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > page, as expected) >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > same for upload example too >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Tree2 is working fine >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but >> its not compiling at the moment. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > The references to jsf api and impl >> are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 1.1.3 is >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > not in ibiblio yet (we need to >> take care of that btw.) I will change >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > them before the official release. >> That shouldn't make a difference >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > though. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm going to be offline for the >> weekend. Can some people take a look >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > at this over the weekend and do >> some basic testing? Just do a mvn >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > install after checking out the >> branch (no RC yet.) >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! >> Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > rates. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Get on board. You're invited to try the >> new Yahoo! Mail Beta. >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- >> > > >> > >> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> > > >> > >> > > > > Aechterhoek 18 >> > > >> > >> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten >> > > >> > >> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> > > >> > >> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > -- >> > > >> > >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > > >> > >> > Aechterhoek 18 >> > > >> > >> > 48282 Emsdetten >> > > >> > >> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> > > >> > >> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> -- >> > > >> > >> Matthias Wessendorf >> > > >> > >> Aechterhoek 18 >> > > >> > >> 48282 Emsdetten >> > > >> > >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> > > >> > >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> -- >> > > >> Matthias Wessendorf >> > > >> Aechterhoek 18 >> > > >> 48282 Emsdetten >> > > >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> > > >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >
