Ok, will do that tomorrow for both (us time ;))
-Matthias On 6/11/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO, I think the best choice is deprecating updateActionListener (and ADF's setActionListener) in favor of the JSF 1.2 setPropertyActionListener. -- Adam On 6/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, > > rendered is also not called if > :) > > On 6/11/06, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's a carry over from c:set I believe ;-) > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > ok, I see > > > > > > so with this in mind we should set the updateActionListener itself to > > > deprecated, > > > since JSF 1.2 introduces such a functionality. > > > > > > value/target is ok... > > > source/target is better > > > > > > anyways > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On 6/11/06, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> -1 > > >> > > >> 1.2 setPropertyActionListener will be using value/target, otherwise > > >> there would be 3 different sets of nouns to associate with this > > >> functionality > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > >> > hey, > > >> > > > >> > I'd like to rename the value/property attributes to from/to. > > >> > Makes more sense to me. since this tag is used in several > > >> > apps, I don't remove the value/property thing. I'll just mark it > > >> > as deprecated. > > >> > > > >> > Any thoughts on that? > > >> > > > >> > -Matthias > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> -------------------------- > > >> Sent from my FrankenBerry Wireless Handheld > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------- > > Sent from my FrankenBerry Wireless Handheld > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > Aechterhoek 18 > 48282 Emsdetten > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
