+1 for I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool.
-----Original Message----- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:04 PM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: Renaming of the archetypes On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To follow the conventions, I think we should rename the archetypes to: > > maven-archetype-myfaces > maven-archetype-jsfcomponents > > Then, update the poms and documentation. I am going to do this if no > one objects ;) I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool. IMO they should by myfaces-archetype-[something]. myfaces-archetype-simple myfaces-archetype-components <--'jsf' is implicit in the 'myfaces' part, no? For example, the ones for Struts are struts-archetype-xxx . Thoughts? -- Wendy
