Everyone brews its own soup here, as we can see ... but ok, I wont complain about a interface as it allows a better flexibility if we think we should provide a framework for others too.
I saw this http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 during my daily blog reading, yesterday
> I'd also be -1 against being able to set it on an individual validator > level; wait 'til someone says it is necessary, and justifies that > need. What do you mean by this? Do you mean we should NOT check if a validator implements this interface but simply assume its implements (even empty) on ValidatorBase? > Also, recognize that client-side validation is only half of the > picture; you > also need client-side converters. Lets do this once needed. In fact, I hope Trinidad become a more integral part of MyFaces so that we can use Tomahawk and Trinidad and ... together :-)
sure! ;)
Ciao, Mario
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
