On 7/13/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All of the points in this thread are valid, I trust those of you taking the lead on this part of the process will do a good job. I will get grumpy if the RC resembles "hey, I think the trunk is ready to go".
then On 7/14/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My internet connection will be off and on for a unknown period of time. I would like to help on this, so if any of you get a build, please post a URL to the proposed artifacts.
Given that we are going to ask for the final 1.1.4 jars to be tested, are you willing to run the tests in advance against either the snapshots that now exist, [1] or against a 1.1.4-RC1 build? If not, we'll just tag 1.1.4, hope for the best, and be willing to move on to 1.1.5 if there's a problem. (I assume that you can report pass/fail on the public list, just no details. (??)) (Aside: we need to decide whether we are using release candidates like Jakarta Commons, or test builds that get graded later like Tomcat and Struts.)
All of this can be improved by getting more committers to sign the TCK NDA and subscribing to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Will do. :) That is, I found the NDA form on http://www.apache.org/jcp/ and assume it just gets sent to the same place as the iCLA form. [1] http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/core-1.1.x/ Thanks, -- Wendy
