Just to close out the thread - the links worked for Matt now as well.
Wendy,
I was calling mvn clean install from here:
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/current
Basis des Projektarchivs: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
UUID des Projektarchivs: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 422166
Knotentyp: Verzeichnis
Plan: normal
Letzter Autor: wsmoak
Letzte ge?\195?\164nderte Rev: 417049
Letztes ?\195?\132nderungsdatum: 2006-06-25 22:09:11 +0200 (So, 25 Jun 2006)
Eigenschaften zuletzt ge?\195?\164ndert: 2006-04-17 21:06:44 +0200 (Mo, 17 Apr 2
006)
and as I said, after a run I got the myfaces impl and api files in:
..\myfaces\tomahawk\sandbox\examples\target\tomahawk-sandbox-e
xamples\WEB-INF\lib>
regards,
Martin
On 7/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's exactly what I tested yesterday and for me, it works.
> Interesting! Do you get any javascript errors?
no
> Also, I still get myfaces-api and myfaces-impl in the
> target/app/WEB-INF/lib directory, even with a mvn clean install
> -Djsf=ri. Could it be that there is still a dependency left somewhere?
well that worked for me.
but I only deleted the myfaces-xxx jars
and!!!! the work folder from my uncle tomcat.
> I had to clean those two libs out several times yesterday to make this work.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I deployed sandbox w/ RI and ran Martin's new example.
> >
> > I figured out two issues. Inside of that example t:commandLink is not
> > working with the h:form AND h:commandLink is not working inside a
> > s:form.
> >
> > Like:
> >
> > That is not working:
> > <h:form ..>
> > ...
> > <t:commandLink value="test2" action="#{formBean.testAction}"/>
> > ...
> > </h:form>
> >
> > and that is not working too:
> > <s:form ...>
> > ...
> > <h:commandLink value="test1" action="#{formBean.testAction}"/>
> > ...
> > </s:form>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > On 7/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Looking at commit log of "svn commit: r422260", I think yes.
> > > I'll give it a try (sandbox w/ RI).
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 7/15/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ok reading the end of the thread now it seems this has been addressed?
> > > >
> > > > Sean
> > > >
> > > > On 7/15/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > To sum up my point:
> > > > > > * Its nothing bad to move now and document its "not compatible to
RI"
> > > > > > * But, as soon as possible we should have a look at making
form/command*
> > > > > > RI compatible
> > > > >
> > > > > So do we have a definitive answer on whether this works with the RI?
> > > > > If not, then I'm -1 for promotion. We have had too many sloppy
> > > > > releases and confusion lately. It can be used in the sandbox just as
> > > > > easily as it can be used in tomahawk. IMO if its not ready to work
> > > > > with the RI then its not ready to leave the sandbox. I don't know the
> > > > > particulars of this component but this is my general feeling about any
> > > > > sandbox component.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Mario
> > > > >
> > > > > Sean
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
