+1 on using that plugin. the plugin is longer on my list; but current things like getting myfaces_core out etc stop me from doing it.
-Matt On 8/4/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... but I'd really like to add a flag to maven-faces-plugin to turn Trinidad-specific superclasses on and off. (IIRC, the Facelet generator is actually already generic). If I got this done, would someone on the Tomahawk side use it? -- Adam On 8/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is currently some ADF/Trinidad specific code in (FacesBean, > AdfFacesContext (aka Requestcontext),...) > > > -Matthias > > On 8/4/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > As for the generator - can we check if the Trinidad generator can do > > the work for us? > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It's that "unit test" vs "integration test" thing again. Your > > > > example will show that facelets works as an integration test, but > > > > isn't really as comprehensive as having a facelets example for every > > > > component. > > > > > > Yes a facelets example for every component wouldn't hurt. Also, > > > Wendy's work with the Selenium tests on Shale looks promising. Maybe > > > we could "automate" some tests of our own. > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
