http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-607
I've assigned it to myself.
Cheers,
Cagatay
On 8/17/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Ok, as long as it's compatible with the RI and someone commits the
work, I'm +1 for a custom resolver.
If we want to go for the easier solution of a bean and someone commits
the work for this, I'm +1 for the bean as well.
regards,
Martin
On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That resolver sounds interesting, also sorta bean approach is more than nice.
> As I read this thread the "new" component is not going to make it. Great.
> Adding components like this one looks to me "blow up" the page. Such a
> map/resolver looks like a better approach.
>
> Also Mike is right in his Facelets vs. JSP mail
>
> +0 on map/resolver
> (+0 b/c won't do the work)
>
> -Matt
>
> PS: My Oracle Germany college Frank has written an article about
> JSF/Security. Already printed...
> http://www.orablogs.com/fnimphius/archives/001790.html
>
> On 8/16/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/16/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hmm, but we suggested to build it as a map-bean to be able to pass
> > > parameters. So what would be the positive aspect of using a resolver
> > > with regard to parameters?
> >
> > If it's a resolver, you should be able to pass the parameters directly.
> >
> > Ie,
> >
> > security:ifAnyGranted="manager, admin" or security:ifGranted:manager
> > or security:ifGranted('manager').
> >
> > basically, once it's a resolver, we should have total control of the format.
> > I think something like this is probably simplest:
> >
> > security:ifGranted:manager
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
