Is there any way to search for "Patch Available" issues? I haven't been able to figure this out yet myself.
On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for removing wish. Its all a wish - even the bugs. I think the current voting system is a better way for finding what the popular requests are. IMO those take second priority over "Patch Available." sean On 8/18/06, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > for a "wish" ? > > Yes, I do it if only I believe the demand seems important. > > But no problem for me, I'd not oppose getting rid of wish type issues. > > On 8/18/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, I'm doing that and assign the issues that I find reasonable to > myself. > > > > for a "wish" ? > > > > I look at open issues (bugs) but not wishes. > > > > > On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I think we should get rid of the "wish" issue type. > > > > > > > > > > I don't see that we're likely to have someone surfing the jira issue > > > > > tracker looking for things to do. > > > > > > > > > > If someone wants to wish for something, the user list (or maybe a > wiki > > > > > page) seems like a better place to do it. > > > > > > > > > > All this issue type is doing is collecting work that other people > are > > > > > not willing to do themselves. > > > > > > > > > > We already have a "new feature" type that people use when they plan > to > > > > > provide patches to implement their new feature. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > >
