On 8/26/06, Ernst Fastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I understood the recent discussions correctly we should
create JIRA Issues seperately for every change we want to make
rather than Issues like "Enhancing component x".

No, that's not really what's being said.
Every change should be associated with a Jira issue, but a jira issue
can be associated with many changes, as long as it's reasonable :-)

I'd say that "Enhancing component x" is fine as a single jira issue
provided that all of these changes are going to be made within the
same period of time.

What we don't want to do is have code changes without jira issues
(that's the biggest problem), nor do we want to have never-ending jira
issues that can't be closed because they cover too many tasks.


Should I add them to "MyFaces Tomahawk - New Component" or is
it possible to create the PPRPanelGroup as a component in JIRA ?

I'll create PPRPanelGroup for you.   Until someone creates a new
component entry, I think using "new component" makes the most sense.

Since this are a lot of changes I will probably not be
able to fix all of them before the next release. Is creating
the JIRA issues now  in conflict with the release policy
if they are not fixed befor the next release?

For improvements, I'd say as long as you're planning to work on them,
go ahead and create the issues.   Just set the fix version to be the
newest snapshot.

Considering the next release is probably months away, it's unlikely to
be problem in any case.

Reply via email to