Well, it should be easy to change this line of the template to call the _ComponentUtils-method.
Are you sure that there are no changes apart from this? I could have sworn I saw some edits of this, e.g. to deliver a boolean instead of a Boolean and small stuff like this. It could as well be that there is no corresponding XML-file for these components. Good news in any case! regards, Martin On 9/11/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/11/06, Gert Vanthienen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apparently, I misunderstood the information in Lance's mail: the SVN > version of the files contains the call to > _ComponentUtils.getStringValue(). Is there any reason why this method > is used for String values (and not for e.g. boolean or Object)? > > If the call to _ComponentUtils.getStringValue() is no longer necessary, > the generated code is a rather good match to the code currently in SVN, > with the exception of some whitespace and comments. My suggestion would > be to move the comments to the top of the file and commit the > regenerated files after checking that there are no other semantic changes. I haven't looked at the code in a while, but I think the _ComponentUtils methods explicitly typecasted to a String, boolean, Integer, etc. It may also throw appropriate exceptions or log errors. Basically, it's centralizing all operatings on a ValueBinding so they only need to be changed in one place to change the behavior everywhere.
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
