I tested the *rerenamed* getscrolling agains 1.13 and 1.14 of
tomahawk, to ensure backward comp.

-Matthias

On 9/11/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, the getScrolling was only a cosmetic thing - I wanted to use a
properly namespaced method name.

I don't think that this is important enough to hold off the release.

regards,

Martin

On 9/11/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bleah.
>
> Guess we're hosed, then :-)
>
> So do we want to break backward compatibility sooner rather than
> later?  And if so, should we make the other breaker changes (like
> getScrolling) at the same time?
>
> I hate to delay 1.1.4, but I'd rather do that than have 1.1.3 using
> one set of changes, 1.1.4 using a slightly different one, and 1.1.5
> using yet another one, making all three of them incompatible.
>
>
> On 9/11/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, that's it - it's necessary for compatibility with the RI :(
> >
> > At least I've got no idea how to fix the problem if not ruining the
> > one or the other compatibility problem.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 9/11/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hey Martin.  Yeah, that was the reason we renamed it -- to keep 1.1.3
> > > compatibility.
> > > Are you saying that there's another place where we broke 1.1.3 
compatibility?
> > >
> > > If so, we need to fix that.   I'm -1 on any release that breaks our
> > > stated compatibility between 1.1.3+ and the current versions
> > > unnecessarily.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, if we must rename it to have tomahawk working with
> > > the RI, then that's what we need to do.
> > >
> > > On 9/11/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I think it must be this - thanks, Mike! with the information in this
> > > > thread, I can certainly start voting.
> > > >
> > > > I saw that you guys renamed the getScrolling again. I wonder about the
> > > > clear...xx method that I renamed as well, to comply with the RI's
> > > > method. Thinking about this now, I believe this will mean we can't use
> > > > implementation version 1.1.5 with tomahawk 1.1.3. This whole
> > > > javascript thing is a problem - the interdependency between
> > > > implementations and different components in the component libraries
> > > > shows here clearly!
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 9/11/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hey Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you talking about this one?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-467
> > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1377
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Matthias Weßendorf [04/Aug/06 11:07 PM]
> > > > > put to branch (shared_203)
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/11/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Just a short question - I remember a bug with the datatable showing
> > > > > > the wrong number of lines - that has been fixed, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/11/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > The MyFaces Core 1.1.4 build is available for evaluation:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >    http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/core-1.1.4/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This build has passed the TCK. (Thanks, Dennis!)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note that this vote also includes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  * The myfaces-master pom v1.0.4
> > > > > > >  * Shared v2.0.3 (which can also be used for the next Tomahawk 
release)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > These additional artifacts can be found in the 
'm2-staging-repository'
> > > > > > > directory beneath the URL above.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > More information on this release, including a link to the JIRA 
release
> > > > > > > notes and details on configuring your project's Maven build to 
use the
> > > > > > > staging repository, is available on the wiki:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >    http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease114
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please evaluate this build and then vote on the release:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ]   +1  Let's release it!
> > > > > > > [ ]   +0  It's fine with me.
> > > > > > > [ ]   -0   This doesn't seem like a good idea.
> > > > > > > [ ]   -1   I do not support this release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Wendy Smoak
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>


--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



--
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to