Actually I agree with wendy here...
a shared build and release should be mandatory,
otherwise it will be versioning hell.

The parts i like to see in the commons are mainly Validators,
Converters and other renderkid independent stuff with stable api.
I see no reason to release tomahawk just to have a release of commons
with some additional well tested converters included. Or to delay a
commons release because of problems in tomahawk.

I dont see a versioning hell here, tomahawk and the sugested commons
should be independend. If there parts inside on which tomahawk relays,
there is no problem tomahawk also relays on commons-collections and
other libs without binding to there release cycles.
And there should be nothing in which is a tomahawk specific item
without use for other jsf librarys.

Reply via email to