Martin, Hey, very cool! Have you written up anything describing (a)? I'm very curious about the strategy chosen.
-- Adam On 9/13/06, Martin Haimberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hy everyone, my name is Martin Haimberger and i took part in the GSoC 2006 with the Partial State Saving project for myfaces. The two mayor things to implement were a) Create an partial State Saving Tree b) Render the Tree without calling dispatch() and let the jsp render it I used the tomahowk simple examples to do first performancetests. I activated Clientside statesaving and compaired their length: displayValueOnly 11.450 org.savestate 6.060 partial.save.state Partial Savestate: 52,9% home.jsp 22.754 org.savestate 6.316 partial.save.state Partial Savestate: 27,7% masterDetail 13.870 org.savestate 10.300 partial.save.state Partial Savestate: 74,3% selectbox 15.310 org.savestate 10.808 partial.save.state Partial Savestate with ID Map: 70,6% selectonecountry 3.494 org.savestate 1.896 partial.save.state Partial Savestate: 54,3% tree2NiceWrap 9.902 org.savestate 6.464 partial.save.state Partial Savestate: 65,3% dynamiclists 5.998 org.savestate 4.760 partial.save.state Partial Savestate with ID Map: 79,3% The secound test was a speed test how fast the page gets rendered without dispatching to the jsp. The problem is that the response times of the same request fluctuate a lot if it is called a certain times. So measuring is very difficult. But what i can say is that it is (after the first request) about 20% faster than alway dispatching to the jsp who it was done till now. In the next weeks my Mentor, Martin Marinschek and I will adapt the code and commit it to the svn server. Regards Martin Haimberger
