That option we didn't follow, cause the user would have classes then
for which he wouldn't find the sources in svn.

If part of the release-build would be that the generated sources are
also stored in both svn and as a jar-file, then the world might look
different.

regards,

Martin

On 9/22/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey.
> Or being able to configure maven in a way that it will NOT refactor the
> sources, instead it should simply create a shared and shared-source jar.
>
said that, wouldn't it be possible to revert the shared_ stuff in svn at
all? And refactor tomahawk and impl itself only for the release builds?
Then we have the best of both worlds, during development no hassle with
the shared_ stuff and standalone release builds.

Just some thoughts ...

Ciao,
Mario




--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to