I agree ,If deprecation is not really possible ( for now I could also not think of a appropriate way to do so) then the clear cut has to be done sooner or later anyway. And as erik-berndt already pointed out, the migration for the users will be just a text-replace in their jsps or facelet-xhtml files. Before upgrading users should read the release notes anyway :-)
On 10/13/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ernst Fastl schrieb: > On one hand it is right that components of the sandbox are potential > subjects > for change, but would it really hurt to do a slower deprecation? Like > Werner > pointed out, some people are already using sandbox components in their > production environments although this may never have been recommended > they do it. So I think a slower transition with some kind of deprecation > mechanism would be appropriate wouldn't it? > The problem is, there is no deprecation mechanism... I asked what the consensous is here, regarding this problem, but I think a clear cut has to do it for now... At least in my case, the dojoInitializer, this is non critical, not too many users use it, we might have to go a different route for the high level end user components, I guess. But keeping the tld codebase twice is a huge burden.
