Why not having a "commons-component" library?
For converters and validators we neet also another TDL with another prefix.
I prefer to follow Bernds suggestion of having multiple commons artifacts.
Alternativly we can put all tag-components
(components/converters/validators/...?)
together into a single artifact.Or just all into a myfaces-commons jar,
but IMHO we can't go without at least one new TLD.
Wouldn't that be really confusing for the end user. He would have to
define another TLD in his JSP headers which is not really a component
collection but rather a... what?
Therefore my feeling is, that this one belongs more to a component
library than the common jsf utilities collection.
The suggested common-component is really a component-library with
components completly independend of any jsf-implementation or
renderkit,
and the converter/validator artifacts are tag-librarys.
Regards,
Volker
2006/11/27, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Even if there is no renderer specific stuff involved, this goody is
quite component like. Particularly the tag definition is the thing
that makes it diffult to integrate into commons. We should not have
another TLD in commons with another recommended prefix ("c" ?!).
Wouldn't that be really confusing for the end user. He would have to
define another TLD in his JSP headers which is not really a component
collection but rather a... what?
Therefore my feeling is, that this one belongs more to a component
library than the common jsf utilities collection.
This component being a goody that is nice for the tomahawk as well as
the trinidad and tobago user is no argument IMO. This should be more a
signal for us that we have to compass a one-that-plays-everything
component library in the far (bright) future. i.e. Melt together our
great component sets.
So, I'm
-0.5 for putting it into (future) commons, and I'am still
+1 for moving it to tomahawk
Manfred
On 11/27/06, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i didn't know this component before, looks very usefull.
>
> I prefer to have this in the new commons project, to enabel the use in
> non tomahawk applications e.g. tobago. There is no renderer specific
> stuff involed?
>
> Regards,
> Volker
>
>
> 2006/11/26, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm planning to promote s:selectItems to tomahawk. Component satisfies all
> > of the requirements needed for promotion.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Cagatay
> >
> > http://myfaces.apache.org/sandbox/selectItems.html
> >
> >
> >
>
