On 2/3/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just followed our official release procedure that was established by Sean Schofield: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Release_Procedure Point 6 says: "Take a vote on the dev list (only PMC votes are binding). Vote is taken against a specific SVN revision number (not release candidate necessary)" Wendy, is this outdated? Maybe this procedure was established before the "people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/m2-staging-repository" did actually exist?
Yes, that needs to be changed. Exact details are left up to the projects themselves, but the general rule is that you build something, then vote on it. (I can't vote on something that doesn't exist, especially when in some cases it needs to have passed the TCK first.)
To get the core 1.1.5 release out as soon as possible I tend go on with this procedure. After the release is out we can start a discussion for a new procedure. Is that ok?
This particular vote thread only covers the 'maven' bits, right? Those pieces are less complicated and are unlikely to have problems, so I'm fine with going ahead and publishing them after this vote finishes. When you get to Core and Shared, though, I'd be very uncomfortable with a vote on a svn revision. -- Wendy
