Hi, Great job Mario, I'm also interested in conversation stuff with spring and jsf, personally I was sick of getting lazyinitexception when doing wizards with jsf-spring-hibernate before.
I'd really really like to help if you need:) Regards, Cagatay On 2/22/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Mario, Sounds good. I think a simple announcement to the user list regarding moving the components is appropriate. Sounds like there is no one who will be affected, except those who will be moving to "fusion" anyway (we should come up with a new name right away if a new name is necessary). On 2/22/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Other than the conversation tag, what else will be removed from the > > sandbox? > tomahawk-sandbox > There is a "behind the scenes" code called "RequestParameterProvider" > which allows you to add a class which will then be called when a URL > will be encoded. > This is the central mechanism to ensure that a url parameter called > conversationContext is existent on each url, though, you can configure > it to add any other parameter you would like to. > IMHO its very unlikely that an application will make any use of this > mechanism, its more something for libraries. > I don't remember someone else ever asked a single question about it, so > I think its not in use by someone else. > > tomahawk-sandbox15 > There is the dynaForm stuff which creates a input/output formular based > on EJB3 annotations (including validators/converters) with some > additional features e.g. to create select listboxes in case of 1:n > annotations. > Since this is a somehow complex piece of code and there is no > documentation (though, there is a demo) and I've never announced it on > the user list I am pretty sure there is no user now. > > > Regarding the ConversationTag itself I know at least a single person who > helped me debugging it. I think its a month back or so where I asked him > if he still uses it, and he do. He told me he'll have a look at the > spring like solution too. > > > Anyway. As you said, Before we remove anything from the sandbox we > definitely should ask on the user list and I'll be of any help if it > comes to migration issues. > Maybe we can move some of the deprecated sandbox code to a code.google > or sourceforge project, though, in dormant mode for sure. > > Ciao, > Mario > >
