-1 on 1.5.0. We have called it 1.1.5 for many months. Also the reasons
I presented for NOT calling it 1.1.4
+1 on the next version of 1.6.0
Manfred Geiler wrote:
Yes, good idea.
So, next tomahawk release would be 1.5.0.
+1 on that from my side
--Manfred
On 2/23/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well.
other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers get out
of sync.
regards,
Martin
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
> Branch 1.1.5 created.
>
> --Manfred
>
>
> On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off.
> > > We must decide between
> > > - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to core
1.1.4 and
> > > therefore might confuse users
> > > - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and have a
tomahawk
> > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5
> >
> > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which will be compatible with
> > Core 1.1.5.
> >
> > (There is plenty of information in the archives if anyone asks "what
> > happened" to 1.1.4. As Paul points out, Tomcat skips version numbers
> > in their public release series.)
> >
> > --
> > Wendy
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
