One big concern I have is that we do not go to such an extreme (like Tobago did) that we are no longer compatible with other component sets. Once you start requiring a specific kind of form or document, then you've just made yourself incompatible with anything else that might require a specific kind of form or document.
I'm not entirely certain what the issue with the Extensions filter is (beyond portlet-incompatiblity). Once it's configured, it seems to work just fine, and it doesn't break compatiblity with other component sets. On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also one *target* should be getting rid of the extension filter and use an approach like Trinidad document or Tobago's page, where the components (their renderers) register themselfs and put out their resources, like funny javascript. also the "common fileupload" (done in Tobago Contrib, already). On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > myfaces commons should first contain the "tomahawk non-renderkit" things. > putting stuff there from tobago and trinidad is a next step, to me > > -M > > On 3/15/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >From: "Mike Kienenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > Still a huge first step would be a "myfaces commons", containing stuff > > > > > like updateActionlistener and validators/converters. > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > > > I would think that even moving the validators and converters out would > > be a > > > > big step since they provide client side support. There would need to be > > a > > > > *single* script delivery mechanism and the component renderers would > > need to > > > > have API hooks in order to act on behalf of these "components" > > (converters, > > > > validators) that don't have renderers. > > > > > > We're only talking about moving things with no renderkit dependencies > > > into commons. That's true for most of the Tomahawk converters and > > > validators. Commons would contain things that should be usable in > > > any JSF implementation an d with any JSF component set. > > > > Oh, I was thinking about Trinidad's Converters and Validators. > > > > Gary > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
