however, it is archived here: http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg13167.html
-M On 3/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(forwarded the wrong email before) Hi, Omar today mailed the proposal for further discussion to general list. -M ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mar 22, 2007 8:16 PM Subject: RE: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF To: [email protected] Omar Tazi wrote: > This is a proposal to donate a rich component library for the JavaServer > Faces technology to the Apache Software Foundation. Please compare, just for our information, with: http://myfaces.apache.org/tobago/ http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/ > Based on a quick Google and a USPTO search there doesn't seem to be > anything that would cause trouble with the "RCF" name. Er, what about Eclipse RCF? Rich Client Framework. But this relates to the question I asked above: do we need a separate project and name for multiple sets of Faces components? Are we keeping them separate, or eventually just having a box of parts? --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
