Hi Tim,

thanks.

Regards,
Martin Haimberger


On 4/24/07, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Martin, I am looking at MYFACES-1587 below and the corresponding
Geronimo
JIRA (GERONIMO-3038)....

Thanks,
Tim McConnell


Martin Haimberger wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Nice greatings from Christoph Ebner and me. A lot of issues have been
> resolved since our last status update, but there are also some new
> issues.
>
> Here is the updated list of last time:
>
> MYFACES-1563 - Martin will ovetake this from Christoph.
> MYFACES-1255 - resolved
> MYFACES-1264 - Christoph will do that.
> MYFACES-1253 - resolved
> MYFACES-1204 - resolved
> MYFACES-1236 - This issues is open. Needs to be done if the JSF 1.2
> implementation is nearly done. Can somebody overtake this please?
> MYFACES-1251 - resolved.
> MYFACES-1217 -  Implemented christoph will recheck this.
> MYFACES-1200 -  This issues is open. Needs to be done if the JSF 1.2
> implementation is nearly done. Can somebody overtake this please?
> MYFACES-1434 - Just two tags left, convertDateTimeTag patch available,
> FacetTag is in progress.
> MYFACES-1444 - resolved
> MYFACES-1109 - Regarding the comment from Mathias Broekelmann, this is
> not compatible with the JSF 1.2 specification. Could be done for
> t:dataTable
> MYFACES-1548 - resolved
> MYFACES-1564 - could not reconstruct the bug. Can somebody take a look
> at it to affirm?
> MYFACES-1220 - closed
> MYFACES-1221 - resolved
> MYFACES-1230 - resolved
> MYFACES-1582 - patch available (xsd attached)
> MYFACES-1584 - resolved
> MYFACES-1223 - low priority
>
> Here are the new, unassigned issues:
>
> MYFACES-1587 - Can somebody take a look at it?
> MYFACES-1594 - Christoph will do that.
>
> We hope this helps.
>
> Regards,
> Christoph Ebner and Martin Haimberger
>
>
> On 4/20/07, Martin Haimberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hy,
>>
>> a short update from my side:
>>
>> MYFACES-1204 - patch available.
>> MYFACES-1434 - was allready done.
>> MYFACES-1221 - tests available.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>>
>> On 4/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hey Martin,
>> >
>> > any updates here ?
>> > (any patches that are still sitting in jira ?)
>> >
>> > -M
>> >
>> > On 4/6/07, Martin Haimberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Hi *,
>> > >
>> > > Nice greatings from Christoph Ebner and me. Now a short overview of
>> > > the JSF 1.2 implementation status. We looked over the unassigned
>> > > issues:
>> > >
>> > > MYFACES-1563 - Christoph will do that.
>> > > MYFACES-1255 - Crosschecked with RI -> Only javadoc
>> > > MYFACES-1264 - Christoph will do that.
>> > > MYFACES-1253 - Crosschecked with RI -> Only javadoc and
specification
>> > > MYFACES-1204 - Martin (me) will check this.
>> > > MYFACES-1236 - This issues is open.
>> > > MYFACES-1251 - This issues is open. Needs to be done if the JSF 1.2
>> > > implementation is nearly done.
>> > > MYFACES-1217 -  Implemented christoph will recheck this.
>> > >
>> > > MYFACES-1200 -  This issues is open. Needs to be done if the JSF
1.2
>> > > implementation is nearly done.
>> > >
>> > > MYFACES-1434 - Martin (me) will do "Add element
>> > > "deferred-value/method" for elements in the taglibs"
>> > > MYFACES-1444 - patch available
>> > > MYFACES-1109 - Regarding the comment from Mathias Broekelmann,
>> this is
>> > > not compatible with the JSF 1.2 specification. Could be done for
>> > > t:dataTable
>> > > MYFACES-1548 - patch available
>> > > MYFACES-1564 - Christoph Ebner will do that.
>> > > MYFACES-1220 - This issue is open.
>> > > MYFACES-1221 - Martin (me) will test this with an own renderkit.
>> > > MYFACES-1230 - Specification Request, someone should recheck this.
>> > > MYFACES-1582 - patch available
>> > > MYFACES-1584 - patch available
>> > > MYFACES-1223 - low priority
>> > >
>> > > I hope this helps.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Christoph Ebner and Martin Haimberger
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>> >
>> > further stuff:
>> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to