OK, great! Let me know if (or, rather, *when*) I slip again. :)
-- Adam On 5/12/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, my original message said "non-trivial, non-sandbox", but when I typed it in again, I didn't include it. Sorry for the confusion. On 5/12/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I completely agree for anything non-trivial, but > what about comparative trivia like: > - whitespace changes > - deleting unused variables > - fixing spelling errors > - etc.. > > There's no value to mentioning these in release notes, > and if you have a thorough SVN commit message > (which should always be required practice), no one > will wonder why it was done... Just looking for > the happy medium. If you put too much procedure > on checkins, then people will: > - Merge two tasks into one checkin (very bad procedure) > - Not even bother with simple stuff > > All that said, I absolutely should have referred > some checkins last week to > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-135 > Mea culpa! > > -- Adam > > > On 5/10/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just an FYI that the standard MyFaces practice is that all non-sandbox > > commits should have JIRA issues (and references in the commit log). > > > > This makes it easier to create release notes as well as to research > > why a change was made. > > >
