I'm +1 for the new list. For those of you who use the continuum success notifications as a validation that your commits didn't break anything, shame on you! :) You should DEFINITELY compile locally before committing your code, and not rely on continuum.
On 5/15/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I can moderate it too if needed. Thanks Wendy, Bruno On 15/05/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/15/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > currently there are 91 subscribers to the commits list (4 of them with > > digest option). > > don't know if there is a way to do a mass subscribe. > > There is. I'll request that infrastructure seed the notifications > list with the current list of subscribers to the commits list. > Existing subscribers will notice a change in the 'to' address and may > need to adjust mail filters. > > I'll moderate it, and need one more volunteer. No one except > Continuum should be writing to it directly, so moderation messages can > largely be ignored. The reply-to on both the commits and > notifications lists should be set to the dev list. > > -- > Wendy >
-- Grant Smith
