I think we were discussing the version numbers a while ago. I think I remember that the 1.x line is for the JSF 1.1 line and 2.xx for the JSF 1.2 and 3.xx for the JSF 2 and so on.
But looks like, that myfaces 1.2 will be 1.2 (instead of 2.0.0), there isn't a reason, why Trinidad should follow this pattern. -M On 5/17/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm curious - why? 1.2 seems the more obvious choice for a version number, especially since we haven't really changed APIs. I'd rather save 2.0 for an API overhaul. -- Adam On 5/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like 2.0.0 more > > .M > > On 5/17/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we should release all of the plugins at once; > > they're one project. Would this be 1.2.0 or 2.0.0 > > of this project? > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > On 5/17/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As part of preparing the release for myfaces 1.2 the > > > maven-faces-plugin 1.2 needs to be released. Although I have never > > > done it I think I have enough information to volunteer to do it. What > > > policy, if any, are we following to the plugins release? We release > > > all them at the same time, or just in an individual basis? For the > > > release of myfaces 1.2, only that plugin is needed. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
