let's hope they don't call the next JSF "JSF 6" (based on Java EE 6)
But, that would mean, we can jump from 1.2 => 6. Not to bad! :-)) -M On 5/17/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for 1.2 as well, MyFaces 2.0 for JSF 1.2 and MyFaces 3.0 for JSF 2.0 sounds just strange to me. Regards, ~ Simon On 5/18/07, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 for 1.2. > > > > IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-community members that way and keeps it aligned with the spec releases. > > > +1 > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
