Mmh, you are right. I didn't read correctly the issue. In any case, it should be fixed as the TCK passes.
Cheers, Bruno On 05/06/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're talking about the jsf-api method signatures. Either they match the spec/JSF RI api docs, or they don't :-) Yes, it's painful to go through and verify each one (I'd think that the TCK would do that), but I don't see how it can be avoided. On 6/5/07, Bruno Aranda (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] > > Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1262. > ----------------------------------- > > Resolution: Fixed > Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT > > I guess we can close this one, as it is difficult to assess when will be done and the current implementation works fine > > > JSR-252 Issue #99: Specified Java EE 5 Generics usage where applicable. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: MYFACES-1262 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1262 > > Project: MyFaces Core > > Issue Type: New Feature > > Components: JSR-252 > > Reporter: Stan Silvert > > Assignee: Mathias Broekelmann > > Fix For: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT > > > > > > Specified Java EE 5 Generics usage where applicable. > > https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99 > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
