On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 09:39 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: > On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 13:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: > > > On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is there anything in shale-goodies yet? > > > > > > The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few > > > related experiments. > > > > > > Craig > > > > > Thanks. Looking forward to it. Has any one ported Petstore 2.0 to Spring > > JPA and tomcat or Jetty? > > > > Craig, is there any thought on Shale and WebBeans? (Hope not to offend > > any one on this list) > > > > I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other > people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what > Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want > to pick one framework for that kind of stuff, be it Shale's, > Trinidad's, Orchestra's, Seam's, WebBeans's, Spring's ... but other > than that there's no reason you shouldn't be able to use Shale > features and WebBeans features together, since they are both built on > top of JSF APIs. > > Craig > Thanks for the insight. It may be useful to define how Shale positions itself to WebBeans, regardless of what implementation the user may decide to take.
> [1] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=299 > > > BaTien > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: > > > > > On 6/26/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Mario Ivankovits schrieb: > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > >> code.google.com is fine for that. > > > > > > > I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when > > > > > > > depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1]. > > > > > > > Any objections about it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao, > > > > > > > Mario > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ++1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that > > > > > was used for Shale "extras" that didn't fit into the usual Shale > > > > > project: > > > > > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies > > > > > > > > > > Doesn't "myfaces-goodies" have a nice ring? > > > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > > >
