Now I see that trunk is 1.0.2...
Please, from what branch I get 1.2.1??
Bruno
Bruno E. Grossi wrote:
> Adam,
>
> now I have compiled the trunk version, but a noted that pom is
> indicating version 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT...
> And I need to change some generics to compile with jsf 1.2 ri...
>
> Bruno
>
> Bruno E. Grossi wrote:
>> Adam,
>>
>> my version with that lines was retrived from
>>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/faces-1_2-070427/trinidad
<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/faces-1_2-070427/trinidad>,
>> in May 10. There is some old, and we are updating only to get
"type"
>> on script tags.
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>> Adam Winer wrote:
>>> Bruno, I suspect you have some old code lying around
>>> on the classpath.
>>>
>>> That said, for the 1.2 version of Trinidad, 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> is not the most up-to-date version - that'd be the 1.2.1
release.
>>>
>>> I'm very curious what version you've been using, because the
>>> lines you're referring to have been absent since some time
>>> in May, IIRC.
>>>
>>> -- Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/12/07, Bruno E. Grossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Simon,
>>>>
>>>> I updated trinidad to a snapshot version
>>>> (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad-api/1.2.1-SNAPSHOT/trinidad-api-1.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar)
>>>>
>>>> from 05-Jul-2007, but I have an error.
>>>>
>>>> On UIXComponentUINode.__getAdapter(UIComponent component)
>>>> (line 439), I have a ClassCastException because
__getUINode(component)
>>>> method returned an UIComponentUINode for an HtmlTableLayout
subclass
>>>> component, when __getAdapter(..) expected an
UIXComponentUINode.
>>>> Investigating that error, I see that Faces Bean isn't
instance of
>>>> UINodeFacesBean, that forces an construction of an
UIComponentUINode.
>>>>
>>>> I observed that faces-bean.properties was changed from my last
>>>> version,
>>>> removing some lines:
>>>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXSingleStep=org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.uinode.nav.SingleStepFacesBean
>>>>
>>>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.html.HtmlCellFormat=org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.uinode.UINodeFacesBean
>>>>
>>>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.html.HtmlRowLayout=org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.uinode.UINodeFacesBean
>>>>
>>>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.html.HtmlTableLayout=org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.uinode.UINodeFacesBean
>>>>
>>>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.html.HtmlScript=org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.uinode.UINodeFacesBean
>>>>
>>>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.core.data.CoreTree=org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.uinode.UINodeFacesBean
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When I add that lines, there are no problems.
>>>>
>>>> Questions:
>>>> 1- Why we need that lines? Why we need to force
UINodeFacesBean??
>>>> 2- It's need to all UIX components?
>>>> 3- Why that lines was removed?
>>>> 4- It´s a bug?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Bruno E. Grossi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Simon Lessard wrote:
>>>> Err get the nighty build from that url, sorry:
>>>>
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/
<http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/11/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> > Hello Bruno,
>>>> >
>>>> > You can find the source at
>>>> http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/source-repository.html
>>>> >
>>>> > As for the nighty builds they can be found at
>>>>
http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8081/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=13
<http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8081/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=13>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > ~ Simon
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 7/11/07, Bruno E. Grossi <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Simon,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > where I find that nighty build, and the source?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thanks,
>>>> > > Bruno
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Simon Lessard wrote:
>>>> > > Hello Bruno,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Latest nighty build fix the missing type attribute
error. The name
>>>> attribute error still hold true though. We keep up work to
make the
>>>> generated markup more standard compliant, but the best
workaround
>>>> you have
>>>> for now is to help us with the renderers I fear.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ~ Simon
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On 7/11/07, Bruno E. Grossi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Hi,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > we're validating our JavaEE framework (Powerlogic's
jCompany
>>>> 5.0) to
>>>> pass W3C Markup Validator as Strict HTML/XHTML and we found
some
>>>> errors
>>>> generated by Trinidad (branch 1.2):
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > 1- <tr:form> generates an invalid attribute "name" on
<form>
>>>> tag.
>>>> > > > 2- Generated <script> tags don't have a "type" attribute:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > "Error Line 20 column 7: required attribute "TYPE" not
>>>> specified.
>>>> <script>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > The attribute given above is required for an element that
>>>> you've used,
>>>> but you have omitted it. For instance, in most HTML and XHTML
>>>> document types
>>>> the "type" attribute is required on the "script" element and
the "alt"
>>>> attribute is required for the "img" element.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Typical values for type are type="text/css" for
<style> and
>>>> type="text/javascript" for <script>."
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > There are any solution (option or workaround) to solve
that
>>>> problems?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Thanks,
>>>> > > > Bruno E. Grossi
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
