+1 On 7/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /branches > /branches/1_1_6 > /branches/1_2_1 > /tags > /tags/1_1_2 > /tags/1_1_3 > /tags/1_1_4 > /tags/1_1_5 > /tags/1_2_0 > /tags/1_2_1 > /1_1_x <--- the trunk for JSF 1.1 development > /1_2_x <--- the trunk for JSF 1.2 development I like that "tomcat style". -M > > The great advantage: We can do this step by step without breaking > anything. All we need to do is point the externals in the "current" > project to the right trunk folder. We even can do the restructuring > first and point the externals to the corresponding "1_1_x" trunks and > in a second step switch "current" to the "1_2_x" trunks without a need > to restructure again. > " > > WDYT? > > --Manfred > > > > On 7/20/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do not like the idea of "current (symlink to jsf1.2)". To me JSF 1.1 > > and 1.2 are two products and should be treated as such. > > > > Paul Spencer > > > > Andrew Robinson wrote: > > > Not to be too anal, but would: > > > > > > current (symlink to jsf1.2) > > > jsf1.1 > > > jsf1.2 > > > > > > Be a little more "tidy"? > > > > > > It should also consider the web site right? Right now, it only shows > > > the current/trunk branch. Perhaps the site should be versioned as > > > well. Example using tomahawk: > > > > > > myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/current (symlink to 1.2) > > > myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/1.2 > > > myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/1.1 > > > > > > On 7/20/07, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > "Why not": how many users are ready to make the jump to > > >> > JSF 1.2? Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are > > >> > on JSP 2.0 or earlier. > > >> > > >> Yeah, but we're just making 1.2 the trunk, not forcing people to use 1.2. > > >> > > >> Again two active branches current11 and current12 sounds good to me, > > >> where > > >> current12 has the trunks > > >> > > >> Cagatay > > >> > > >> On 7/20/07, Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 7/20/07, Adam Winer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > "Why not": how many users are ready to make the jump to > > >> > > JSF 1.2? Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are > > >> > > on JSP 2.0 or earlier. > > >> > > > > >> > > It'd make my life way easier if the Trinidad trunk were 1.2, > > >> > > definitely, I just doubt that would hold true for the users. > > >> > > > > >> > > Just for starters, what about the committers? How many > > >> > > of us can stick to 1.2? > > >> > > > > >> > > -- Adam > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On 7/20/07, Cagatay Civici < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > About subprojects, I think the case is same for them, if we make > > >> 1.2 > > >> the > > >> > > > trunk for api, why not set 1.2 branches of subprojects as trunks > > >> too? > > >> Also > > >> > > > after doing it, we may need to reconfigure current and current12 > > >> too. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On 7/19/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > > Assuming MyFaces 1.1.7 is released so the SVN configuration in > > >> the > > >> POM > > >> > > > > of next version of MyFaces will be correct. Otherwise people, > > >> including > > >> > > > > Continuum, who are using 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT from the repository > > >> will be > > >> in > > >> > > > > for a very big surprise. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Qualified +1 otherwise -0 for the above reason > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Although I missed the discussion, my preference would be for a > > >> MyFaces > > >> > > > > 1.1 and 1.2 trunk/branch since both are active products. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Paul Spencer > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > >> > > > > > Hi, > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts by our group to > > >> become > > >> > > > > > the current trunk. > > >> > > > > > Currently the JSF 1.2-work lives on a branch ( > > >> 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT is > > >> the > > >> > > > > > current version). > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Please cast your vote > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > >> > > > > > [ ] +1 for moving the myfaces 1.2.x to trunk > > >> > > > > > [ ] +0 > > >> > > > > > [ ] -1 and why.............. > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -M > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.irian.at > Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, > Development and Courses in English and > German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
-- Grant Smith
