The naming pattern we've used would look more like: -adfinternal-onclickOnImgInput
-- Adam On 8/3/07, Piyush Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I allowed to name for this capability ? Basically, my capability is > testing if "onclick" is supported on "input" element of type "img" ? > > How about : something like this : > > <capability name="-adfinternal-onclick-input-img" value="false"/> > > Are you ok with this name ? > > -Piyush > > > Adam Winer wrote: > > We should have an agent capability flag for this. > > See the files in trinidad-impl/src/main/resources/META-INF/agents > > as well as org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.agent.TrinidadAgent. > > > > The problem with "isPDA()" is that we've lost all context > > for what feature is really relevant, and no decent way to indicate > > that some PDA might in fact support the feature, either now > > or in the future. > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > On 8/2/07, Piyush Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Adam, > >> > >> You commented the following on my patch for TRINIDAD - 85 > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-85 : > >> > >> /"I'm not fond of the isPDA() check. Please add an agent flag, defaulting > >> to true, and set it to false for the relevant platforms. I also see a lot > >> of non-two-space whitespace here." > >> > >> /Can you elaborate a bit more on what you are recommending ? What do > >> you mean by an agent flag ? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -Piyush > >> > >> > >
