|
This is an aside. Don't use camelCase in pseudo-classes. ng. It should be :read-only. Since the p_AF prefix is a private implementation, do this instead: af|inputText:read-only::content {} That should expand to: .af_inputText.p_AFReadOnly .af_inputText_content {} And like Simon said if it IE6 is a requirement for you, you can try: :read-only af|inputText::content {} That should expand to .p_AFReadOnly .af_inputText_content {} If that doesn't work, try this: *:read-only af|inputText::content {} - Jeanne Simon Lessard wrote: Probably... Although div does give more room for CSS customization, like dimensions and text positioning, I don't see why it should be needed in that case since it applies only to readOnly fields. DIV are rendered quite fast though, so the only real problem with it here is that it prevents placing anything to the right of the content (like the message) without including another nested table. |
- [Trinidad] af|inputText:readOnly::content - Does it wo... Danny Robinson
- Re: [Trinidad] af|inputText:readOnly::content - D... Simon Lessard
- Re: [Trinidad] af|inputText:readOnly::content... Matthias Wessendorf
- Re: [Trinidad] af|inputText:readOnly::content... Adam Winer
- Re: [Trinidad] af|inputText:readOnly::con... Simon Lessard
- Re: [Trinidad] af|inputText:readOnly:... Jeanne Waldman
- Re: [Trinidad] af|inputText:read... Simon Lessard
