Hi guys, anyone of you able to help ?
-Matthias On 9/1/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Someone who has commit rights to the incubator IP clearance page has > to commit it there - so Michael couldn't have done so, I suppose. Has > there be an Apache member taking this over? > > regards, > > Martin > > On 8/31/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, supposedly. The work for the IP Clearance form was submitted by > > the JSR-301 Project Lead on the 16th. At least that's what I was told > > which is why he told me to go-ahead and submit it. But I haven't seen > > it processed by Apache yet. > > > > Scott > > > > Martin Marinschek wrote: > > > Hi Matthias, Scott, > > > > > > has the IP Clearance form already been filled out and committed? > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> but all this, can be fixed, when it's already committed. > > >> > > >> We needed NOTICE and LICENSE files inside both JARs as well. > > >> > > >> -M > > >> > > >> On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> yes pom as well. > > >>> > > >>> and also files in: > > >>> -META-INF/services/ > > >>> -META-INF/ > > >>> > > >>> @myfaces: a bug .... > > >>> > > >>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hey, it looks like I did the impl, just not the API. I'm fixing that > > >>>> now. > > >>>> > > >>>> That said, does the liscence need to be in the POM files? I didn't > > >>>> notice a liscence in the MyFaces 1.2 POM files... I have no problems > > >>>> putting it in, certainly, but we may want to make the 1.2 branch of > > >>>> MyFaces compliant with this as well. > > >>>> > > >>>> Scott > > >>>> > > >>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hey Scott, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> did a quick look. > > >>>>> POMs and API .java class have to contain the Apache 2.0 license as > > >>>>> well. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Greetings, > > >>>>> Matthias > > >>>>> > > >>>>> PS: build runs .... :-) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> there was no real tomahawk bridge. > > >>>>>> that stuff is part of myfaces 1.1 (the core impl) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> the difference here is that 301 specifies a way, how a JSF 1.2 > > >>>>>> application should work inside a portal. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> for jsf 1.1 there was "just" a note like "JSF 1.1 should run in a > > >>>>>> portlet..." (very simplified statement) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> So, no not a replacement, "just" an IMPL of the java SPEC ;-) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Sounds good to me. Should we open up a discussion though on > > >>>>>>>> "where" this should be committed so that we can hit the ground > > >>>>>>>> running once the paperwork is listed? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Scott > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone. After tearing though the bureaucracy much slower > > >>>>>>>>>> then I > > >>>>>>>>>> would have liked, I uploaded the code to MYFACES-1664 for the > > >>>>>>>>>> JSR-301 > > >>>>>>>>>> Portlet Bridge. This code should comply with the latest public > > >>>>>>>>>> draft of > > >>>>>>>>>> the JSR-301 specification and, once we figure out where to put > > >>>>>>>>>> this and > > >>>>>>>>>> get it made available in svn, I'd like to see people get their > > >>>>>>>>>> hands on > > >>>>>>>>>> it and try it out. It is going to change some things (for the > > >>>>>>>>>> better I > > >>>>>>>>>> hope), but if there are any unresolvable issues with it, my hope > > >>>>>>>>>> is that > > >>>>>>>>>> we can get those concerns voiced so that we can incorporate them > > >>>>>>>>>> into > > >>>>>>>>>> the final draft. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> That said, what are our next steps? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> we have to wait with the commit, until that the paperworks > > >>>>>>>>> (Schedule > > >>>>>>>>> B) is listed here: > > >>>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -M > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Scott > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> further stuff: > > >>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > >>>>>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Matthias Wessendorf > > >>> > > >>> further stuff: > > >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > >>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > >>> > > >>> > > >> -- > > >> Matthias Wessendorf > > >> > > >> further stuff: > > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > >> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
