This may be a case where the 1.2 MR1 TCK had a test for this and the original
1.2 TCK did not.

Regardless of the TCK having a test for this method or not, the fact that
it's not implemented technically
means there's a compatibility issue here.

This should be fixed as soon as possible.



Martin Marinschek wrote:
> 
> Hi Ed,
> 
> I haven't been using JSF1.2 so far, except for migrating over stuff
> I'm implementing in 1.1 - and surely we haven't been tweaking the TCK.
> Very interesting - I'm forwarding to the dev-list.
> 
> @Everyone: guys, what's up here??
> 
> regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 9/10/07, Ed Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello Martin,
>>
>> Ryan alerted me to something the TCK should have caught: the MyFaces
>> implementation of UIData.invokeOnComponent() is non-existant:
>>
>>     @Override
>>     public boolean invokeOnComponent(FacesContext context, String
>> clientId, ContextCallback callback) throws FacesException {
>>         // not supported yet
>>         return false;
>>     }
>>
>> The javadoc for this method is very explicit: [1], and you should know,
>> because invokeOnComponent() was your idea in the first place!
>>
>> Are you handling this in some other way in order to pass the TCK?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/1.2_MR1/docs/api/javax/faces/component/UIData.html#invokeOnComponent(javax.faces.context.FacesContext,%20java.lang.String,%20javax.faces.component.ContextCallback)
>>
>> --
>> | 155 Business Days until JavaOne 2008
>> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
>> | homepage:         | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
>> | aim: edburns0sunw | iim: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> http://www.irian.at
> 
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
> 
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-MyFaces-UIData.invokeOnComponent%28%29-tf4416267.html#a12597990
Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to