Hi guys, this mail on the Trinidad list ([1]) lead me to the following issue.
In Trinidad, we extend the standard validators, like the doubleRangeValidator, but the "logic" of the validate is inherited. Inside of save/restore State methods, we delegate to the FacesBean instance, which takes care of saving / restoring all properties, like maximum or some Trinidad extra properties like "messageDetailMaximum". See [2] for the full source code. When using Trinidad on top of the RI (and client side validation is DISABLED), there are some issues (see [1]). It looks like there is a private property used the the RI (DoubleRange)Validator to indicate if maximum or minimum has been set (and these properties are also saved / restored). Since this is private, it's "odd" to add this property to Trinidad's (DoubleRange)Validator as well, to get it working with the RI, isnt' it ? I checked the MyFaces IMPL code of (DoubleRange)Validator (see [3]) and it doesn't use such a property. So here, this combination (MyFaces + Trinidad (client validation DISABLED) works. What do you think about this ? Do you want me to file an issue ? Thx, Matthias [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg42199.html [2] http://tinyurl.com/22ojtz [3] http://tinyurl.com/3bvsdb -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
