that was not related to your vote :-) That was just an update on the release-voting process ;-)
If for instance, a user finds a very important thing, that REALLY needs to be fixed before doing a release. Her/His -1 vote will get attention as well ;-) -Matthias On 9/26/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, remember that my vote is not official, I am a committer, not a > PMC/voting member. > > -Andrew > > On 9/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we got five +1 votes: > > > > -Matthias Wessendorf > > -Andrew Robinson > > -Grant Smith > > -Simon Lessard > > -Adam Winer > > > > Afterwards, we got a -1 from Andrew Robinson, but he made a withdraw > > of his -1 vote. > > > > Note, that there is no veto on a release: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > > > > But usually a -1 is a valid reason to rethink the release! > > Not needed here, because the withdraw of Andrew's -1 ;-) > > > > I'll follow up w/ the required announcement etc. > > > > -Matthias > > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache > > > MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first version > > > of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1 and > > > JSF 1.2 CORE. > > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]). > > > > > > Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote. > > > > > > How to test those JARs ? > > > > > > 1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1]) > > > 2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file: > > > ... > > > <pluginRepositories> > > > <pluginRepository> > > > <id>apache.stage</id> > > > <name>Apache Stage Repository</name> > > > <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins</url> > > > <layout>default</layout> > > > </pluginRepository> > > > </pluginRepositories> > > > ... > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, > > > and why.............. > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matthias > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
