Conceptually, I am in favor of a merge. I wouldn't wait for JSF 2.0 to do it, though. +1.
On 10/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At least, 1 year, that is my guess. > > So, I agree w/ Kito here > > -M > > On 10/22/07, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think that's a good idea, since JSF 2.0 is a year or more > away.... > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action > > http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring > > http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bernhard Slominski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:41 AM > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; MyFaces Development > > > Subject: AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I guess it makes sense, to make the merger a post JSF 2 project. > > > So all features, which are included in JSF 2 (e.g Remoting) should not > > > move, > > > but just stay in Shale. > > > Also let's see where templating and component development goes before > > > making > > > a decision about Clay. > > > So Shale is then the JSF 1.X add-on framework, when it comes to JSF 2 > > > all > > > Add-Ons move to MyFaces. > > > > > > Bernhard > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag > > > > von Craig > > > > McClanahan > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 01:48 > > > > An: MyFaces Development; Shale Developers List > > > > Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Remoting > > > > > > Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too. > > > > > > > > > > +1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect JSF 2.0. > > > > > > > > A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access, > > > > particularly for resources provided in a jar file instead of as > > > > exploded files in a WAR. Until JSF 2 comes along, that's pretty > > > > useful all by itself. > > > > > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > -- Grant Smith
