There are already "tomahawk-facelets.jar" files out there if you want to use something with drop-in support. See the wiki page for a link to Bruno's http://code.google.com/p/tomahawk-facelets project.
I'm still -1 on any hand-maintained facelets taglib.xml being put directly into the Tomahawk jar since once you go this route, it becomes impossible to fix an error without recompiling MyFaces Tomahawk or manually hacking up the jar file, and -- as you pointed out -- there are still likely errors in the wiki page. Someone just corrected the schedule component a few days ago. I don't have a problem with putting hand-maintained changes in another integration jar, like was done for http://code.google.com/p/tomahawk-facelets If three years of maintaining the file on the wiki hasn't been enough to catch all of the errors (with a large base of end-users who are able to modify the page), why do you think that restricting the correction of errors to MyFace committers is going to be an improvement? Most of the wiki page corrections and additions have been made by non-committers. The component generator is already being used for Trinidad and MyFaces 1.2, if I'm not mistaken. Why not fix the problem correctly? On 10/22/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I know, this has been discussed in lengthy already, but I'd like to warm > it up again. > > I'd like to add the facelets taglib and tag-handler one can find all > around the net to our myfaces libs. > I found this a REAL pain to figure out all the required stuff to get > tomahawk and the sandbox running again with facelets - every newbe will > be lost, there are other problems one should solve and not to such > trivial stuff which requires a lot of searching. > > I know, we have a wiki for this, but as far as I can see this is not > really maintained. And it is hard to maintain, we (I think I can write > WE here, sorry if not) developers prefer to work with svn and not with > any wiki page where you even can't be sure if the stuff compiles - and > it is much harder to remember the wiki page than lookup the resource in > your ide and fix some stuff. > I think the argument that only a component generator is safe enough to > create the taglib is not valid, if there are errors in the taglib or one > of its handler class they will uncover sooner or later, in the end, we > have a fully working drop-in-able tomahawk and sandbox stuff. > > PLEASE, lets go that way!! > > Ciao, > Mario > >
