+1 on a facelets-only JSF project and not be related to tomahawk at all. -1 for #1 I think tomahawk should have built in facelets support for its own components and not have to rely on an outside project/jar
-1 on using tomahawk in the name (for above reason) (non-binding) On 10/24/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1. > > I'd suggest tomahawk-facelets[.jar] as the name since that's what it > is. The versioning should match Tomahawk's versioning, and hopefully > we'll release a new version each time Tomahawk is released. > > On 10/24/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Lets start up a MyFaces Facelets project. A name needs to be found. > > > > The aim of this project will be to contain: > > 1) the taglibs for tomahawk and tomahawk-sandbox as long as we have the > > generator not running again. I'd like to ask Bruno if we can jump-start > > with his google project > > 2) everything which is directly related to stuff which only works with > > Facelets, being that components or whatever. > > > > > > [ ] +1 yea, lets start > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 no, for those reasons ..... > > > > > > I'll do the maven work then (a not very sophisticated one, just copy it > > from another of our modules) > > > > I am not sure if we collect enough substance for this project to survive, > > but time will tell. > > > > > > Ciao, > > Mario > > > > >
