Well, if aliasBean only works with Myfaces Core, I wonder why we even include it with Tomahawk. It sounds like it should really be an extension point of MyFaces Core.
In any case, it doesn't sound like a candidate for MyFaces commons at present. On 10/24/07, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > in general i'm +1 for aliasBean into the commons project, it just did > not fit into > tobago. > > But there is a problem: afaik aliasBean did not work with RI. > The myfaces lifecycleImpl has a special handling of BindingAware > interface components, which are afaik only aliasBean and > aliasBeanScope. I don't think this special handling is included into > RI. > > > Regards, > Volker > > 2007/10/24, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Why wouldn't aliasBean work as a commons project component? I > > haven't looked at the implementation, but at first glance of the docs, > > it doesn't seem to do anything renderkit-specific. I looked at the > > renderer implementation and it simply looks like its being used as a > > callback hook back into the component, and it's not doing any > > rendering. > > > > On 10/24/07, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > although the thing from tomahawk i was missing most, aliasBean, did > > > not fit into tobagos layout system. > > > But things like converters and validators should work with any > > > implementation. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Volker > > > > > > 2007/10/24, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Lets start up the long awaited MyFaces Commons project. > > > > > > > > The aim of this project will be to contain all stuff which do not belong > > > > to a component. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 yea, lets start > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > [ ] -1 no, for those reasons ..... > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll do the maven work then (a not very sophisticated one, just copy it > > > > from another of our modules) > > > > > > > > Ciao, > > > > Mario > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
