+1 sounds great.
On 10/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 non-binding > > I also have some suggestions for things to go into this project which > would be helpful. > > Scott > > Paul Spencer wrote: > > +1 for the commons project. > > > > Paul Spencer > > > > Mario Ivankovits wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >>> 1) Will their be a JSF version specific version, i.e. commons_1.2 and > >>> commons_2.0? > >> Hmmmm .... I don't think so, at least for the start not. Lets start > >> another module once we cross that bridge. > >> > >>> 2) What are some of the module will you be moving into the project(s)? > >> Some stuff from the shared project which is definitely stable like parts > >> of org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.RendererUtils > >> The RequestParameterProvider from tomahawk-sandbox which do not have a > >> single component but is required in Orchestra. > >> (Orchestra currently uses a copy of this framework) > >> The RedirectTracker from tomahawk-sandbox. > >> > >> Thats all whats just popping out of my brain. > >> > >> Well, and in general what Mike outlined: > >>> Ie, if the validator/component/converter/other can be used with any > >>> reasonable[1] combination of > >>> JSF_RI/MyFacesCore/Tomahawk/Tobago/Trinidad/IceFaces/RichFaces/PortletBridge, > >>> > >>> then it should be available here. > >> > >> There is room for this project, exact details about what we take over > >> could be discussed then. > >> > >> Ciao, > >> Mario > >> > >> > > > > > >
