Forgot an "examples" folder under each sub-project (instead of under "trunk" like it is now)
On 10/27/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to propose the following refactoring of the tomahawk > project under myfaces > > Current structure under tomahawk: > trunk/ > assembly (for building releases) > core (tomahawk "core") > examples (examples for the core project) > sandbox (sandbox) > sandbox15 (Sandbox with JDK 1.5 dependency) > pom.xml > > Proposed change: > > trunk/ > core/ > assembly/ > tomahawk-build/ > tomahawk-api/ > tomahawk-impl/ > tomahawk-facelets/ > sandbox/ > assembly/ > sandbox-build/ > sandbox-api/ > sandbox-impl/ > sandbox-facelets/ > branches/ > jsf-1.2/ > current/ > core/ > assembly/ > tomahawk-build/ > tomahawk-api/ > tomahawk-impl/ > tomahawk-facelets/ > sandbox/ > assembly/ > sandbox-build/ > sandbox-api/ > sandbox-impl/ > sandbox-facelets/ > (Releases here - ex 1.1.7) > jdk-1.5/ > current/ > core/ > assembly/ > tomahawk-build/ > tomahawk-api/ > tomahawk-impl/ > tomahawk-facelets/ > sandbox/ > assembly/ > sandbox-build/ > sandbox-api/ > sandbox-impl/ > sandbox-facelets/ > (Releases here - ex 1.1.7) > jsf-2.0 (future)/ > > Along with this change will be migration to use the maven faces > plug-in for component generation. This will facilitate the inclusion > of facelets support. The plug-in would be based on the current myfaces > generator that is being used for myfaces core 1.2 and re-factored to > use 1.1. The jsf-1.2 branch can use the existing files, with possible > modifications as required. > > The sandbox15 becomes a separate release of the sandbox with 1.5 code > added. I see this being much more flexible than a separate jar. This > way tomahawk core classes can be made to support JDK 1.5 as desired. > > Question: is the branch for JDK 1.5 on JSF 1.1 required, or should the > JSF 1.2 branch be used for this code instead? > > I don't have a whole lot of time, but I am willing to put some work in > to help split the projects out and setup the maven plug-in part. Other > help would be needed. > > If people agree, I see this as a phased approach: > > 1) Create a new branch under tomahawk to house the work in progress. > 2) Modify the myfaces code in the maven-faces-plugin to support JSF > 1.1 (configuration support is already there, the plug-in just doesn't > use it) > 3) Setup the tomahawk-build core project xml files > 4) create an SVN tag as the branch point > 5) starting moving core over > 6) repeat 3-5 for the sandbox > 7) repeat 3-5 for a jsf-1.2 branch and optionally the jdk-1.5 branch. > > 8) (in parallel to 1-7): update the framework for nightly builds, and > any changes to the "system" that would need to be made for these > changes. > > Opinions? > -Andrew >
