> Regarding dependencies:
> We should be careful about dependencies in jsfcommons. Right.
> The Joda converter would be a candidate for an *optional* compile
> dependency.

+1

>
> --Manfred
>
>
>
>
>  On 10/31/07, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Although it'll create a dependency, Joda is great:) so +1.
> >
> > Cagatay
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/31/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > What are the thoughts about providing a Joda DateTime converter in the
> > > upcoming commons project ?
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.irian.at
> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
> Development and Courses in English and
> German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to