cool! a nice wiki page!! On Nov 30, 2007 7:43 PM, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And on one of the console outputs from the how-to, it is possible to > read that MyFaces is initializing > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxSAMPLES/Running+JBoss+Seam+2.0.0.GA+on+Geronimo+2.1 > > Cheers, > > Bruno > > > On 30/11/2007, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have seen a message today on the Geronimo's mailing list with a > > howto on running seam on Geronimo. That should mean that it runs fine > > with myfaces... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bruno > > > > On 30/11/2007, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Grant, if you are using Seam or active in that community, > > > please try the combi :-) > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:55 PM, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone have any experience with this potential release, and Seam > > > > 2.0.0.GA ? Recently (well about 4 months ago now), Seam dumped Myfaces > > > > in > > > > favor of the RI, so it would be excellent to get our foot back in that > > > > door, > > > > so to speak. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 9:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > k > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT > > > > > > > in. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out. > > > > > > > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should we just release it? > > > > > > > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want to get > > > > > > some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like the > > > > > > Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries, and > > > > > > then > > > > > > vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable. For > > > > > > example see: > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html > > > > > > > > > > > > That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC bits > > > > > > lying around. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Grant Smith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
